Compare Audi A8 D3 vs Nissan Altima 9 vs Nissan Maxima A36
Variants
3.0 CVT
3.0 CVT LWB
3.0 TDI DPF quattro AT LWB
3.0 TDI PDF quattro AT
3.0 TDI quattro AT
3.2 FSI CVT
3.2 FSI CVT LWB
3.2 FSI quattro AT
3.7 V8 quattro AT
4.0 TDI quattro AT
4.0 TDI quattro AT LWB
4.2 BiTDI quattro AT LWB
4.2 BiTDI quattro DPF AT
4.2 FSI quattro AT
4.2 FSI quattro AT LWB
4.2 quattro AT
4.2 quattro AT LWB
6.0 W12 quattro AT
6.0 W12 quattro AT LWB
2.0T
2.5 AWD
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
436 L / 15.4 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
531 kg / 1171 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17, 235/40 R19
245/45 R18, 245/40 R19
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4900 mm / 192.9 in
4897 mm / 192.8 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Weight
1574.0 kg / 3470.1 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2824 mm / 111.2 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.8 L/100km / 30.2 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
85.8 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
354 Nm / 261.1 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
CVT
Production
Availability
2019
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
77%
24%
27%
Pros
- Glorious 4.2 TDI and W12 engine options
- Much improved ZF 6HP transmission
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Much more modern inside
- Decent styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Robust VQ35DE V6 engine
- Much improved styling
- Good appointments inside
Cons
- Unreliable range of FSI engines
- Adoption of CVT for FWD
- No powerful engine options
- Not the highest grade of build
- CVT
- Limited by MacPherson front suspension
- Stuck by CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.