Compare Audi A8 D2 vs Audi A8 D5 facelift vs Audi A7 C8

Variants
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.5 TDI quattro AT
2.8 174PS
2.8 174PS AT
2.8 174PS quattro
2.8 174PS quattro AT
2.8 193PS
2.8 193PS AT
2.8 193PS quattro
2.8 193PS quattro AT
3.7 AT
3.7 quattro AT
4.2 quattro AT
50 TDI
55 TFSI
60 TFSI e
60 TFSI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
525 L / 18.5 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
13.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.0 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic power steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Independent on trapezoidal lever
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
381.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
5034 mm / 198.2 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in | 1973 mm / 77.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1945 mm / 76.6 in | 2130 mm / 83.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1908 mm / 75.1 in | 2118 mm / 83.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheelbase
2926 mm / 115.2 in

Performance

Electric Range
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic tiptronic

Production

Debut
2018 North American Autho Show / 2019 Frankfurt Motor Show
Made In
Germany

Reviews

Neofiliac score
72%
81%
67%
Pros
  • Superb suspension setup
  • Rather good NA engine lineup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Great exterior styling
  • Decent performance
  • Sleek styling (in SWB)
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Weak automatic transmissions
  • Too many gizmos
  • Engine keeps getting smaller
  • Uglier than the A6
  • Impractical
  • Sold with small engines
  • Too many electronic gizmos

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.