HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi A4 B8 vs Audi A6 C6 facelift vs Citroen C6

Variants
1.8 TFSI 120PS
1.8 TFSI 120PS CVT
1.8 TFSI 160PS
1.8 TFSI 160PS CVT
1.8 TFSI 160PS quattro
2.0 TDI 120PS
2.0 TDI 143PS
2.0 TDI 143PS CVT
2.0 TDI 143PS quattro
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS quattro
2.0 TDIe 136PS
2.0 TFSI 180PS
2.0 TFSI 180PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 211PS
2.0 TFSI 211PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 211PS quattro
2.7 TDI
2.7 TDI CVT
3.0 TDI 240PS quattro
3.0 TDI 240PS quattro AT
3.2 FSI CVT
3.2 FSI quattro
3.2 FSI quattro AT
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI CVT
2.0 TDI CVT
2.0 TDIe
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI CVT
2.7 TDI
2.7 TDI CVT
2.7 TDI quattro AT
2.8 FSI
2.8 FSI CVT
2.8 FSI CVT
2.8 FSI quattro
2.8 FSI quattro AT
3.0 TDI quattro
3.0 TDI quattro AT
3.0 TFSI quattro AT
4.2 FSI quattro AT
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft ~ 962 L / 34.0 cu-ft
546 L / 19.3 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
580 kg / 1279 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
12.4 m / 40.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
PSA PF3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
117 mm / 4.6 in
Size | Height
1459 mm / 57.4 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4703 mm / 185.2 in
4927 mm / 194.0 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
1826 mm / 71.9 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1551.0 mm / 61.1 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2808 mm / 110.6 in
2843 mm / 111.9 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
47%
60%
52%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspension all-around
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Rather good styling
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Very good exterior styling
  • Good interior appointments
  • Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
  • Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
  • Very unreliable V6 petrol
  • Carbon build-up in all FSI / TFSI models
  • Bad CVT transmission
  • Unreliable range of FSI engines
  • Strange and hellish timing chain setup on the V6 and V8 petrol engines
  • Mass adoption of CVT for FWD
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable engines
  • Interior fit and finish not the best

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.