Compare Audi A4 B6 vs Audi A4 B5 facelift vs Kia Cerato

Audi A4 B5 (8D) facelift Sedan (1999-2001)

Audi | Cars

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.6

1.8T 150hp

1.8T 150hp CVT

1.8T 150hp quattro

1.8T 163hp

1.8T 163hp CVT

1.8T 163hp quattro

1.8T 170hp

1.8T 170hp CVT

1.8T 170hp quattro

1.8T 170hp quattro AT

1.8T 190hp

1.8T 190hp quattro

1.9 TDI 101hp

1.9 TDI 115hp

1.9 TDI 130hp

1.9 TDI 130hp CVT

1.9 TDI 130hp quattro

2.0

2.0 CVT

2.0 FSI 150hp

2.4

2.4 CVT

2.5 TDI 155hp

2.5 TDI 155hp CVT

2.5 TDI 163hp

2.5 TDI 163hp CVT

2.5 TDI 180hp quattro

2.5 TDI 180hp quattro AT

3.0

3.0 CVT

3.0 quattro

3.0 quattro AT

1.6

1.8

1.8 AT

1.8 quattro

1.8 Turbo AT

1.8T

1.8T quattro

1.8T quattro AT

1.9 TDI 110hp

1.9 TDI 110hp quattro

1.9 TDI 116hp

1.9 TDI 116hp AT

1.9 TDI 116hp quattro

1.9 TDI 90hp

1.9 TDI 90hp AT

2.4

2.4 AT

2.4 quattro

2.4 quattro AT

2.5 TDI

2.5 TDI AT

2.5 TDI quattro

2.5 TDI quattro AT

2.8

2.8 AT

2.8 quattro

2.8 quattro AT

1.5 CRDi

1.6

2.0

2.0 AT

2.0 CRDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft

440 L / 15.5 cu-ft

381 L / 13.5 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Payload

550 kg / 1213 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

Multi-link

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

10.1 m / 33.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height

1428 mm / 56.2 in

1470 mm / 57.9 in

Size | Length

4548 mm / 179.1 in

4479 mm / 176.3 in

4480 mm / 176.4 in

Size | Width

1772 mm / 69.8 in

1733 mm / 68.2 in

1735 mm / 68.3 in

Track Width | Front

1528.0 mm / 60.2 in

1498.0 mm / 59.0 in

1495.0 mm / 58.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1526.0 mm / 60.1 in

1485.0 mm / 58.5 in

Wheel Size

15 in

Wheelbase

2650 mm / 104.3 in

2610 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.31

0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 3

Euro 2

Production

Availability

1999 ~ 2000

Reviews

Neofiliac score

47%

42%

20%

Pros

Multi-link suspensions all-around
Good 0.28 drag coefficient

Multi-link + Double-wishbone for AWD models

Small turning circle

Cons

CVT for FWD
Unreliable automatic transmissions
Still very front-heavy
Some oil consumption issues

Lesser rear suspension setup for FWD
Uninspiring styling
Unreliable automatic transmission

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.