Compare Audi A4 B6 vs Toyota Camry 5 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 3 facelift

Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp CVT
1.8T 150hp quattro
1.8T 163hp
1.8T 163hp CVT
1.8T 163hp quattro
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp CVT
1.8T 170hp quattro
1.8T 170hp quattro AT
1.8T 190hp
1.8T 190hp quattro
1.9 TDI 101hp
1.9 TDI 115hp
1.9 TDI 130hp
1.9 TDI 130hp CVT
1.9 TDI 130hp quattro
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 FSI 150hp
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI 155hp
2.5 TDI 155hp CVT
2.5 TDI 163hp
2.5 TDI 163hp CVT
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro
2.5 TDI 180hp quattro AT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
2.4 154hp
2.4 154hp AT
2.4 160hp
2.4 160hp AT
3.0 190hp AT
3.0 210hp AT
3.3 210hp AT
3.3 225hp AT
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 D-4D
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT
2.2 D-CAT 150hp AT
2.2 D-CAT 177hp

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 720 L / 25.4 cu-ft
472 L / 16.7 cu-ft
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
550 kg / 1213 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1428 mm / 56.2 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4548 mm / 179.1 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
Size | Width
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
153 ~ 155 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
47%
43%
22%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved 5-speed auto transmission
  • Very reliable engines
Cons
  • CVT for FWD
  • Unreliable automatic transmissions
  • Still very front-heavy
  • Some oil consumption issues
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring drive

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.