Compare Audi A4 B5 facelift vs Alfa Romeo 159 vs Alfa Romeo 166
Variants
1.6
1.8
1.8 AT
1.8 quattro
1.8 Turbo AT
1.8T
1.8T
1.8T quattro
1.8T quattro
1.8T quattro AT
1.9 TDI 110hp
1.9 TDI 110hp quattro
1.9 TDI 116hp
1.9 TDI 116hp AT
1.9 TDI 116hp quattro
1.9 TDI 90hp
1.9 TDI 90hp AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 quattro
2.4 quattro AT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI AT
2.5 TDI quattro
2.5 TDI quattro AT
2.8
2.8 AT
2.8 quattro
2.8 quattro AT
1.75 TBi
1.8
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 16V 136PS
2.0 JTDM 16V 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1417 mm / 55.8 in
Size | Length
4479 mm / 176.3 in
4660 mm / 183.5 in
4720 mm / 185.8 in
Size | Width
1733 mm / 68.2 in
1828 mm / 72.0 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2000
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
47%
28%
Pros
- Multi-link + Double-wishbone for AWD models
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Gorgeous design
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
Cons
- Lesser rear suspension setup for FWD
- Uninspiring styling
- Unreliable automatic transmission
- Not GTA offered
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.