Compare Kia Stinger vs Kia Optima 3 vs Kia Cadenza
Variants
2.0 T-GDI 245hp
2.0 T-GDI 256hp
2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi AWD
GT 3.3 T-GDI AWD Euro6d
GT 3.3 T-GDI
GT 3.3 T-GDI AWD
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 GDI 194hp AT
2.4 GDI 201hp AT
2.4 MPI
2.7 MPI 166hp
2.7 MPI 200hp
3.3 GDI 297hp
3.5 MPI 290hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1114 L / 39.3 cu-ft
436 L / 15.4 cu-ft
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1400 mm / 55.1 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4830 mm / 190.2 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
4965 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1870 mm / 73.6 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheelbase
2905 mm / 114.4 in
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.285
0.29
Fuel Economy
9.4 L/100km / 25.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 2
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
44%
38%
Pros
- Great external styling
- Down to 4.9s 0-100kph time
- Good towing capacity
- Good fit and finish
- Much improved exterior styling
- Upgraded transmissions
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Strong exterior styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust powertrain lineup
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Addiction to AWD worsens
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Basic suspension setup with MacPherson front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.