Compare Kia Optima 3 vs Kia Optima 3 facelift vs Kia Rio 4 Sedan
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 GDI 194hp AT
2.4 GDI 201hp AT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi AT
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
2.0 CVVT EcoDynamics
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
1.6
1.6 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
436 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Tire Size
185/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4845 mm / 190.7 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
4384 mm / 172.6 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1725 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Front
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2581 mm / 101.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.285
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Power
130.0 hp / 96.9 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
81.7 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
161 Nm / 118.7 lb-ft @ 4850 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2015
2017 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
44%
44%
19%
Pros
- Much improved exterior styling
- Upgraded transmissions
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Reasonable exterior styling
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.