Compare Volkswagen Passat B5.5 vs Chrysler 200 II vs Chrysler LHS 2
Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp AT
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp AT
1.9 TDI 100hp
1.9 TDI 100hp AT
1.9 TDI 130hp 4Motion
1.9 TDI 130hp 5MT
1.9 TDI 130hp 6MT
1.9 TDI 130hp AT
2.0
2.3
2.3 4Motion
2.3 AT
2.5 TDI 4Motion
2.5 TDI 4Motion AT
2.8 4Motion
2.8 4Motion AT
4.0 4Motion
4.0 4Motion AT
2.4
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.8 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.1 m / 39.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
147 mm / 5.8 in
Size | Height
1491 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4884 mm / 192.3 in
Size | Width
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2742 mm / 108.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.27
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
1999 ~ 2001
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
29%
18%
Pros
- Very interesting W8 and VR5 engine options
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Much improved styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- 9-speed automatic transmission
- No more "throwing it at the wall" approach to engineering
- Lots of interior space
- Some love the quirky design
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Uninspiring handling
- Poor reliability and build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.