Compare Ford Focus 4 Sedan vs Ford Taurus 4 vs Ford Taurus 5
Variants
1.0T
1.0T AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.0 155hp
3.0 200hp
3.0 201hp
FWD
AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
374 L / 13.2 cu-ft
481 L / 17.0 cu-ft
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
47.0 L / 12.4 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16 92H, 215/50 R17 91H, 235/40 ZR18 91W
215/60 R16
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1468 mm / 57.8 in
1425 mm / 56.1 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4539 mm / 178.7 in
5019 mm / 197.6 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1882 mm / 74.1 in (mirror folded)
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Weight
1331.0 kg / 2934.4 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17, 8J x 18
16 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
0.3
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
123.1 hp/L / 2.0 hp/cu-in
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2018
2007 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
13%
21%
Pros
- Clean exterior styling
- Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Lethargic transmission
- Basic suspension setup
- Uninspiring exterior and interior
- Poor handling
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.