Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) Hatchback vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) Hatchback

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) HatchbackMazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0 147
2.0 147 AT
2.0 155 AT
2.0 CD
2.0 155
2.2 CD 129
2.2 CD 163
2.2 CD 180
2.2 CD 185
2.5 170
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%49%32%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good engine lineup
  • Elegantly designed
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • Unconventional shape
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Downgraded diesel engines
  • Exterior design becoming out of date

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.