Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela (BK) vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela (BK)Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%35%42%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.