Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1) vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) faceliftMazda 6 / Atenza II (GH1)Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.2D 163hp
2.2D 185hp
2.5
3.7 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%34%35%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Elegant exterior design
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine option
  • Old transmission options
  • Sterile interior
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.