Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela (BK)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela (BK)
Variants
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.6
1.6 2006+
1.6 AT
1.6 AT 2006+
1.6D Euro3
1.6D Euro4
2.0
2.0 2006+
2.0D

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%42%35%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • GPF ruins many good petrol engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson strut
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.