Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2) vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Mazda 6 / Atenza III (GJ) facelift 2
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%35%53%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Downgraded diesel engines
  • Exterior design becoming out of date
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland styling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.