Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2) vs Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)Mazda 3 / Axela III facelift (BN)Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%35%32%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good exterior and interior design
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Downgraded diesel engines
  • Exterior design becoming out of date
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Downgraded diesel engines
  • Exterior design becoming out of date

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.