Compare Mazda 6 GH2 Sedan vs Mazda 3 BL Sedan facelift vs Mazda 6 GH2 Sedan
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2012
2011 ~ 2013
2010 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
42%
32%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Downgraded diesel engines
- Exterior design becoming out of date
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hatchback version fits the car better
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Downgraded diesel engines
- Exterior design becoming out of date
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.