Compare Subaru Impreza GJ vs Subaru Impreza GD facelift 2 vs Saab 9-5 II
Variants
1.6 5MT
1.6 6MT
1.6 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
1.5
1.5 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
WRX
WRX STI
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.8T XWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
401 L / 14.2 cu-ft
513 L / 18.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
455 kg / 1003 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Spring Strut, Transverse stabilizer
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Spring Strut, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
GM Epsilon II LWB
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4465 mm / 175.8 in
5009 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
2113 mm / 83.2 in
Track Width | Front
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Weight
1885.0 kg / 4155.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2645 mm / 104.1 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
9.5:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
45%
35%
Pros
- Good towing capacity
- Clean exterior design
- Great handling characteristics
- Uprated powertrain options
- Powerful AWD system
- Styling ahead of its time
- Good fit and finish
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good appointments inside
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- 4-speed automatic was outdated by this time
- Lacks modern refinements
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.