Compare Subaru Legacy BL vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0R
2.0R AT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0R
3.0R AT
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
433 L / 15.3 cu-ft
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1425 mm / 56.1 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4665 mm / 183.7 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
31%
22%
Pros
- Interesting range of H4 and H6 engine choices
- Good towing capacity
- Powerful symmetric AWD system
- Decent drivetrain
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Limited by MacPherson front suspensions
- Poor performance
- Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.