Compare Chevrolet Cruze 2 Sedan vs Opel Astra J Sedan vs Opel Vectra C

Variants
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
1.3 CDTI
1.4 100PS
1.4 Turbo (120 Hp)
1.4 Turbo 140PS
1.4 Turbo 140PS AT
1.6 5MT
1.6 6MT
1.6 AT
1.6 CDTI 110PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS
1.6 Turbo 170PS
1.6 Turbo 170PS AT
1.6 Turbo 180PS AT
1.6 Turbp 180PS
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS
1.7 CDTI 130PS
1.7 CDTI ecoFLEX 110PS
1.7 CDTI ecoFLEX 130PS
2.0 CDTI 165PS
2.0 CDTI 165PS AT
2.0 CDTI BiTurbo
1.6 105PS
1.6 Ecotec 100PS
1.8 140PS
1.8 140PS AT
1.8 Ecotect 122PS AT
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS AT
2.0 DTI 100PS
2.0 Turbo 175PS
2.2 155PS
2.2 AT
2.2 DTI 125PS
2.2 DTI 125PS AT
2.2 Ecotec 147PS
2.2 Ecotec 147PS AT
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 Turbo 230PS AT
2.8 Turbo 250PS
2.8 Turbo 250PS AT
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS AT
3.2 211PS
3.2 211PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft ~ 419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft ~ 1010 L / 35.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Solid axle
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
10.0 m / 32.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Delta II
Epsilon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4666 mm / 183.7 in
4658 mm / 183.4 in
Size | Width
1791 mm / 70.5 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1527.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1050 kg / 2315 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
15%
4%
12%
Pros
  • Modern design
  • Car looks just fine
  • Decent exterior design
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Solid rear axle with MacPherson front suspension
  • Build quality questionable
  • Basic suspension set
  • Poor engine lineup
  • Bad reputation for reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.