Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Opel Astra H Sedan vs Chevrolet Sonic

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
1.3 CDTI
1.6 115PS
1.6 115PS AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS
1.8 140PS
1.8 140PS AT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Rigid axle
Torsion
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
10.1 m / 33.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Delta platform

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4587 mm / 180.6 in
4399 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1479.0 mm / 58.2 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2006

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
3%
20%
Pros
  • Not very ugly
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Solid axle on the back
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.