Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Nissan Maxima A33B vs Nissan Sentra B15
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
3.0
3.0 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
1.8
2.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft
329 L / 11.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Spring Strut
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1410 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4920 mm / 193.7 in
4509 mm / 177.5 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2535 mm / 99.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.8 sec
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2000 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
16%
14%
Pros
- Clean styling
- Very lightweight
- Good reliability record
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No RB series engines
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.