Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 125hp
1.6T 150hp
1.6T 182hp
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp start/stop
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp start/stop
1.6T AT
2.0D 140hp
2.0D 140hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
205/55 R16

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
29%
8%
Pros
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
  • Cute exterior design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable automatic transmission
  • NVH issues
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.