Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Toyota Corolla 11 (E170/E180) vs Chevrolet Sonic (Aveo 2)

Chevrolet Evanda

Toyota Corolla 11 (E170/E180)

Chevrolet Sonic (Aveo 2)

Chevrolet EvandaToyota Corolla 11 (E170/E180)Chevrolet Sonic (Aveo 2)
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
1.33
1.4 D-4D
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score11%21%20%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Symbol of boring
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.