HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Ford Fusion vs Ford Taurus 5

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.3
3.0
FWD
AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
448 L / 15.8 cu-ft
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
205/60 R16
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4831 mm / 190.2 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2005 ~ 2009
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
8%
21%
Pros
  • Handsome exterior design
  • Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
  • Comfortable ride
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring exterior and interior
  • Poor handling
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.