Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Ford Focus 2 Sedan vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
1.4
1.6 100hp AT
1.6 100hp
1.6 115hp
1.6D 90hp
1.6D 109hp
1.8 125hp
1.8D
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0D
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4488 mm / 176.7 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1840 mm / 72.4 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
15 in
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d-Temp
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
18%
31%
Pros
- Decent drivetrain
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Poor performance
- Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.