Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Impala 9 vs Chevrolet SS Sedan
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
3.5 211hp FlexFuel
3.5 212hp
3.6 300hp FlexFuel
3.9 230hp FlexFuel
3.9 245hp
5.3 303hp
5.3 SS 307hp
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson strut, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link, with stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1851 mm / 72.9 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
36%
60%
Pros
- Available with small block V8
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- The "rental car" look
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.