HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Sonic vs Chevrolet Cruze 2 Sedan

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.4T
1.4T AT
1.6D
1.6D AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft ~ 419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Spring Strut
MacPherson
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Torsion
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
10.1 m / 33.0 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4399 mm / 173.2 in
4666 mm / 183.7 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1791 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1527.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2006
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
20%
15%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Modern design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.