HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Cobalt vs Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Sonic

Variants
2.2 141PS
2.2 141PS AT
2.4 SS
2.0
2.0 AT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
394 L / 13.9 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Transverse stabilizer
Spring Strut
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Leaf spring
Helical spring
Torsion
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
10.1 m / 33.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
Size | Length
4584 mm / 180.5 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4399 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2624 mm / 103.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
LE5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2006

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
11%
20%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable design
  • Not very reliable
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.