Compare Chevrolet Nubira vs Chevrolet Impala 9 vs Chevrolet SS Sedan
Variants
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.8
1.8 AT
3.5 211hp FlexFuel
3.5 212hp
3.6 300hp FlexFuel
3.9 230hp FlexFuel
3.9 245hp
5.3 303hp
5.3 SS 307hp
2015-2016 MT
2016-2017 MT
2014-2016 AT
2016-2017 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
464 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
485 kg / 1069 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 355x32 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson Strut
MacPherson strut, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Double wishbone
Multi-link, with stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/55 R15
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4515 mm / 177.8 in
4966 mm / 195.5 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
1851 mm / 72.9 in
1897 mm / 74.7 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in
2916 mm / 114.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
LS3
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Power
415.0 hp / 309.5 kW @ 5900 rpm
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
563 Nm / 415.2 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
36%
60%
Pros
- Certainly not conspicuous
- Available with small block V8
- Great naturally-aspirated V8 power
- Reliable LS3 engine
- Manual transmission+V8+RWD
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Rather poor fuel economy for the power output
- Questionable design
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- The "rental car" look
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.