HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo S80 II facelift 2 vs Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S40 II

Variants
D2
D2 AT
T4
T4 AT
T4F
T4F AT
D3
D3 AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
T5 AT
D5
D5 AT
D5 AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.5T AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
404 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Transverse stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1493 mm / 58.8 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4854 mm / 191.1 in
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1907 mm / 75.1 in
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2835 mm / 111.6 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
31%
61%
33%
Pros
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engine choices
  • Still classy and elegant
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Inline-5 engines, including the T5
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not an inspiring drive
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable exterior design
  • Simple interiors

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.