Compare Canon EOS 4000D DSLR vs Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless vs Sigma sd Quattro Mirrorless

Canon EOS 4000D DSLR

Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless

Sigma sd Quattro Mirrorless

Canon EOS 4000D DSLRCanon EOS M50 Mark II MirrorlessSigma sd Quattro Mirrorless

Reviews

Neofiliac score46%48%50%
Pros
  • Rather compact
  • Quite light
  • Fully articulated LCD
  • Good 10.0 fps burst rate
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Very light
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Weather-sealed
  • Viewfinder with great 1.09x magnification
  • Very compact
  • Unique Foveon sensor
Cons
  • Menu not touch-enabled
  • Very low 3.0 fps burst rate
  • Low 18 MP resolution
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Viewfinder coverage is cropped at 95%
  • Viewfinder with low 0.8x magnification
  • Cheap look and feel
  • Poor battery life
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Low resolution EVF
  • Canon is all but abandoning the EF-M mount
  • Menu not touch-enabled
  • Very low 3.6 fps burst rate

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.