Compare Canon EOS M50 Mirrorless vs Canon EOS 4000D DSLR vs Canon EOS 6D Mark II DSLR

Canon EOS M50 Mirrorless

Canon EOS 4000D DSLR

Canon EOS 6D Mark II DSLR

Canon EOS M50 MirrorlessCanon EOS 4000D DSLRCanon EOS 6D Mark II DSLR

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%46%57%
Pros
  • Fully articulated LCD
  • Good 10.0 fps burst rate
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Very light
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Rather compact
  • Quite light
  • Fully articulated LCD
  • Exceptional battery life
  • Built-in GPS functionality
  • Weather-sealed
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Great ergonomics
Cons
  • Poor battery life
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Low resolution EVF
  • Canon is abandoning EF-M
  • Menu not touch-enabled
  • Very low 3.0 fps burst rate
  • Low 18 MP resolution
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Viewfinder coverage is cropped at 95%
  • Viewfinder with low 0.8x magnification
  • Cheap look and feel
  • Low 6.5 fps burst rate
  • Viewfinder coverage is cropped at 98%
  • Viewfinder with low 0.71x magnification

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.