Compare Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless vs Sigma fp Mirrorless vs Sigma sd Quattro Mirrorless

Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless

Sigma fp Mirrorless

Sigma sd Quattro Mirrorless

Canon EOS M50 Mark II MirrorlessSigma fp MirrorlessSigma sd Quattro Mirrorless

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%75%50%
Pros
  • Fully articulated LCD
  • Good 10.0 fps burst rate
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Very light
  • Supports both WiFi and Bluetooth
  • High 18.0 fps burst rate
  • Exceptionally compact
  • Quite light
  • Weather-sealed
  • Weather-sealed
  • Viewfinder with great 1.09x magnification
  • Very compact
  • Unique Foveon sensor
Cons
  • Poor battery life
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Low resolution EVF
  • Canon is all but abandoning the EF-M mount
  • Poor battery life
  • Menu not touch-enabled
  • Very low 3.6 fps burst rate

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.