Compare Hasselblad XCD 65mm F2.8 vs Hasselblad XCD 135mm F2.8
Construction
Form Factor
Normal Prime Lens
Short Telephoto Prime Lens
Image Size
Medium Format (44x33)
Medium Format (44x33)
Lens Mount
Hasselblad X-mount
Hasselblad X-mount
Optical Formula | Elements
10 elements
10 elements
Optical Formula | Groups
6 groups
6 groups
Dimensions
Filter Diameter
67 mm / 2.64 in
77 mm / 3.03 in
Size | Diameter
81 mm / 3.19 in
81 mm / 3.19 in
Size | Length
93 mm / 3.66 in
149 mm / 5.87 in
Weight
727 g / 25.69 oz
935 g / 33.04 oz
Function
Angle Of View
45.7° Diagonal | 38.6° Horizontal | 26.3° Vertical
23.0° Diagonal | 19.2° Horizontal | 12.8° Vertical
Aperture
f/2.8 ~ f/32
f/2.8 ~ f/32
Autofocus
Yes
Yes
Crop Factor
0.8
0.8
Focal Length
65 mm
135 mm
Focal Length (35mm Equivalent)
51.4 mm
106.7 mm
Focus Type
Internal
Internal
Image Stabilization
No
No
Weather Resistance
Yes
Performance
Max Magnification
0.19x
0.17x
Min Focus Distance
500 mm / 19.69 in
1000 mm / 39.37 in
Production
Debut
2018-09-25
2018-09-25
Reviews
Neofiliac score
72%
72%
Pros
- Rather compact and lightweight
- Beautifully constructed
- The normal / standard lens
- Superb build quality
- High level of resolution
- Weather-sealed
- Not as large and heavy as one would expect
Cons
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.