Compare Olympus M.Zuiko ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS vs Canon RF 600mm F11 IS STM vs Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

Canon RF 600mm F11 IS STM

Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS  Canon RF 600mm F11 IS STM  Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM

Reviews

Neofiliac score58%35%88%
Pros
  • Exciting reach
  • Good price point
  • Optically stabilized
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • High maximum magnification
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with a tripod collar
  • Optically stabilized
  • 600mm reach for less than $1k
  • Collapsible design saves space
  • Relatively lightweight
  • Optically stabilized
  • 1.4x maximum magnification
  • Weather-sealed
Cons
  • Dark maximum aperture
  • Very dark maximum aperture
  • Slow autofocus
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Not the most solid construction
  • Not compatible with teleconverters
  • Questionable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.