Compare Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro vs Nikon AF-P DX Nikkor 10-20mm F4.5-5.6G VR vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-24mm F2.8 S

Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

Nikon AF-P DX Nikkor 10-20mm F4.5-5.6G VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-24mm F2.8 S

Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro  Nikon AF-P DX Nikkor 10-20mm F4.5-5.6G VR  Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-24mm F2.8 S

Reviews

Neofiliac score60%60%78%
Pros
  • Optically stabilized
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • Weather-sealed
  • Optically stabilized
  • Light in the hand
  • Good value to performance ratio
  • Weather-sealed
  • Possibility to mount front filters
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Minimal front element extension when focusing
Cons
  • All-in-one lenses tend to offer lower IQ
  • Not the highest grade of build
  • Dark maximum aperture
  • External zoom without zoom lock
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Variable aperture
  • Expensive
  • Plastic exterior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.