Compare TCL X92 QLED vs Samsung QN800A Neo QLED vs TCL R625 QLED

TCL X92 QLED

Samsung QN800A Neo QLED

TCL R625 QLED

TCL X92 QLEDSamsung QN800A Neo QLED TCL R625 QLED
Variants
65
75
85
65"
85"
75"
75"
85"
65"
55"
65"

Reviews

Neofiliac score96%93%73%
Pros
  • High screen-to-body ratio
  • Built-in camera
  • 8K UHD resolution
  • Mini LED backlighting
  • Supports HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, and HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma)
  • Rich color reproduction
  • Exceptional 4500:1 contrast ratio
  • 10-bit display panel
  • Gorgeous QLED panel
  • High screen-to-body ratio
  • 8K UHD resolution
  • Mini LED backlighting
  • Supports HDR10, HDR10+, HDR10+ Adaptive, HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma), and Quantum HDR 32X
  • Rich color reproduction
  • High 1600:1 contrast ratio
  • 10-bit display panel
  • High screen-to-body ratio
  • Full-Array LED local dimming
  • Supports HDR10, HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma), and Dolby Vision
  • 10-bit display panel
  • Bright display panel
Cons
  • Slow response time
  • Slow response time

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.