Compare Kia Sportage 5 vs Kia Sportage 3 vs Kia Sportage 4

Kia Sportage 3 (SL) Crossover (2010-2016)

Kia Sportage 4 (QL) Crossover (2016-2021)

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.6 CRDi 116 MT

1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT

1.6 CRDi 136 DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 MT

1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD

1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD

2.0 CRDi AT

2.0 CRDi AWD AT

2.0 MPI AT

2.0 MPI MT

2.5 GDI AT

2.5 GDI AWD AT

1.6

1.7D 116

2.0 163

2.0 163 AT

2.0D 136

2.0D 136 AWD AT

2.0D 136 AT

2.0D 184

2.0D 184 AWD

2.0D 184 AWD AT

2.0D 184 AT

2.0 GDI

2.0 GDI AWD

2.0 GDI AWD AT

2.0 GDI AT

2.4 176 AWD AT

1.6D 115

1.6D 136

1.6D 136 AWD

1.6D 136 AWD DCT

1.6 GDI

1.6 GDI Euro6d

1.6 T-GDI

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d

1.6 T-GDI AWD

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d AWD

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDI AWD DCT

1.7D 115

2.0D 136

2.0D 136 AWD

2.0D 136 AWD AT

2.0D 185 AWD

2.0D 185 Euro6d AWD

2.0D 185 AWD AT

2.0 GDI 237 AWD AT

2.0 GDI 240 AT

2.0 MPI

2.0 MPI AT

2.0 MPI AWD

2.0 MPI AWD AT

2.0 T-GDI AWD AT

2.0 T-GDI AT

2.4 GDI AT

2.4 GDI AWD AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.7 L / 7.1 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.6 L / 4.9 qt

4.8 L / 5.1 qt

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Chassis Type

Unibody

Offroad | Breakover Angle

17.7 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

28.2 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-polymer

Body Style

Compact crossover

5-door SUV

Platform

Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

172 mm / 6.8 in

Size | Length

4440 mm / 174.8 in

Size | Width

1855 mm / 73.0 in

Track Width | Front

1615.0 mm / 63.6 in

Wheelbase

2640 mm / 103.9 in

2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.37

Electric Range

56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine

G4KIII

Theta II

Engine | Stroke

97.0 mm / 3.8 in

Production

Debut

2021-06-08

Made In

South Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score

32%

26%

42%

Pros

Decent interior
High cargo capacity

Marginal offroad capabilities

Improved fuel efficiency
Marginal capabilities

Cons

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Ugly
Crossover nonsense

Slow and sluggish
No powerful engine options
High 0.37 drag coefficient
Remains ugly

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.