Compare Honda Civic 11 Sedan vs Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler LHS 2

Variants
1.5 VTEC CVT
2.0 i-VTEC CVT
Si 1.5 VTEC
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
47.0 L / 12.4 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform

Dimensions

Size | Height
1497 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4674 mm / 184.0 in
4850 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1801 mm / 70.9 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2736 mm / 107.7 in
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV3-ULEV50
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT, paddle shifters on Sport & Touring
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
2006 ~ 2010
1999 ~ 2001
Debut
2021-04-29

Reviews

Neofiliac score
38%
12%
18%
Pros
  • Distinct styling
  • Good handling
  • Fully-independent suspensions
  • Lots of interior space
  • Some love the quirky design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • CVT
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design decisions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Poor reliability and build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.