Compare Mercedes-Benz EQS V297 vs Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290 vs Audi A7 C8 (4K8) Sportback

Mercedes-Benz EQS V297

Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290

Audi A7 C8 (4K8) Sportback

Mercedes-Benz EQS V297Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290Audi A7 C8 (4K8) Sportback
Variants
AMG EQS 53 4MATIC+
AMG EQS 53 4MATIC+ AMG DYNAMIC PLUS
EQS 350
EQS 450+
EQS 580 4MATIC
43 4MATIC+
53 4MATIC+
63 4MATIC+
63 S 4MATIC+
63 S E-Performance
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro

Reviews

Neofiliac score82%77%67%
Pros
  • Great performance
  • Up to extraordinary 700km electric range
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.20 drag coefficient
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 639hp of power and tremendous 900Nm of torque
  • Decent handling
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Extremely ugly
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • Horrible bastardization of a good sports car
  • Ridiculous hunchback sedan form factor
  • AWD only
  • Uglier than the A6
  • Impractical
  • Sold with small engines
  • Too many electronic gizmos

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.