Compare Mercedes C-Class W206 vs Mazda 3 BM Sedan vs Mazda 6 GH1 Sedan
Variants
C 180
C 200
C 200 4MATIC
C 200d
C 220d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 300
C 300 4MATIC
C 300d
C 300e
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.2D 163hp
2.2D 185hp
2.5
3.7 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
4580 mm / 180.3 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
0.26
Electric Range
99.0 km / 61.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
LF-DE
Engine | Compression Ratio
15.5:1
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic, 9G-TRONIC
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-23
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
35%
34%
Pros
- Excellent ride quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- S-Class-inspired infotainment system
- Lots of standard equipment
- Smart exterior and interior design
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Improved long-term reliability
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Elegant exterior design
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- No powerful engine options
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine option
- Old transmission options
- Sterile interior
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.