Compare Chevrolet Bolt EUV vs Mazda MX-30 vs Mazda CX-9
Variants
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1611 L / 56.9 cu-ft
487 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 2852 L / 100.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
7
Payload
671 kg / 1479 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/50 R17
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
35.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1616 mm / 63.6 in
1570 mm / 61.8 in
Size | Length
4306 mm / 169.5 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Weight
1669.0 kg / 3679.5 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
18 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2655 mm / 104.5 in
2875 mm / 113.2 in
Performance
Electric Range
250 miles (402 km)
Top Speed
192.0 km/h / 119.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Engine
Ford Durtec 35
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
143 hp / 106.6 kW
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2020
Debut
2021-02-14
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
4%
65%
Pros
- Good for postering
- Pay less tax
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Ridiculous form factor
- Poor suspension setup
- Miserably low engine output
- Horrible hunchback crossover styling
- Crossover nonsense
- BEV nonsense
- Rudimentary suspension setup
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.