Compare Chevrolet Bolt EUV vs Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Equinox 2

Variants
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
2.4 Euro6
2.4 Euro6 AWD
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.6 Euro6
3.6 Euro6 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1611 L / 56.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring, Torsion
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/50 R17
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1616 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4306 mm / 169.5 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Weight
1669.0 kg / 3679.5 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Electric Range
250 miles (402 km)
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Automatic Hydra-Matic

Production

Availability
2021
2009 ~ 2017
Debut
2021-02-14

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
21%
37%
Pros
  • Good for postering
  • High cargo capacity
  • Rather reliable powertrain
  • Much improved exterior styling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Ridiculous form factor
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very bland, unfinished styling
  • Falsely marketed as SUV

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.