Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV facelift vs Renault Zoe facelift vs Renault Twingo II
Variants
R110 41kWh
R110 52kWh
R135 52kWh
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft ~ 1614 L / 57.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring, Torsion
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.6 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1611 mm / 63.4 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4145 mm / 163.2 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1489.0 mm / 58.6 in
Weight
1628.0 kg / 3589.1 lbs
1502.0 kg / 3311.3 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in
Performance
Charging Time
120V: 4 miles of range in approx. 1 hour, 240V: Full charge in approx. 7 hours, DC Fast Charge: Up to 100 miles in 30 min
Electric Range
259 miles (416 km)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Manual
Production
Availability
2021
2019
Debut
2021-02-14
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
8%
14%
Pros
- Tax incentives
- Less ugly than the Nissan Leaf
- Small turning circle
- Stylish design
Cons
- Horrible styling
- Poor build quality
- EV nonsense
- Battery pollution
- Poor handling
- Poor suspension setup
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Disastrous build quality
- Poor suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.