Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV facelift vs Chevrolet Cruze 2 Hatchback vs Chrysler PT Cruiser
Variants
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6 TD
1.6 TD AT
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft ~ 1614 L / 57.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring, Torsion
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1611 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4145 mm / 163.2 in
4453 mm / 175.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1791 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1628.0 kg / 3589.1 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Charging Time
120V: 4 miles of range in approx. 1 hour, 240V: Full charge in approx. 7 hours, DC Fast Charge: Up to 100 miles in 30 min
Electric Range
259 miles (416 km)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2017 ~ 2018
Debut
2021-02-14
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
20%
2%
Pros
- Tax incentives
- Slightly improved styling
- Good fuel economy ratings
- So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
- Horrible styling
- Poor build quality
- EV nonsense
- Battery pollution
- Poor handling
- Poor suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Not independent rear suspensions
- Truly epitomizes ugliness
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.