Compare Mercedes-Benz S-Class W223 vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S60

Mercedes-Benz S-Class W223

Volvo S90 facelift

Volvo S60

Mercedes-Benz S-Class W223Volvo S90 faceliftVolvo S60
Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.3 T5
2.3 T5 AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4 D5 163hp
2.4 D5 185hp
2.4 T5 260hp
2.4 T5 260hp AT
2.4D
2.4D AT
2.4T 200hp
2.4T 200hp AT
2.4T 200hp AWD
2.5T 210hp
2.5T 210hp AWD
R AWD
R AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score84%64%33%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting set of I5 engines
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Ugly design
  • 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
  • No more V12
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Uninspiring drive
  • Sterile design inside and outside

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.