Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs Mercedes C-Class W206 vs Mercedes CLS C257
Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
C 180
C 200
C 200 4MATIC
C 200d
C 220d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 300
C 300 4MATIC
C 300d
C 300e
AMG CLS 53 4MATIC+
CLS 220d
CLS 300d
CLS 350
CLS 350d 4MATIC
CLS 400d 4MATIC
CLS 450 4MATIC
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
97 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2939 mm / 115.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
0.24
0.26
Electric Range
99.0 km / 61.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
15.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.4 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic, 9G-TRONIC
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2020-09-02
2021-02-23
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
78%
75%
Pros
- Good performance
- Great comfort
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Excellent ride quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- S-Class-inspired infotainment system
- Lots of standard equipment
- Regained multi-link front suspension
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Less ugly than the C218, though worse than the C219
Cons
- Ugly design
- 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
- No more V12
- Only available with small engines
- Lots of AWD nonsense
- Horrible complexity from mild hybrid
- Less practical than the E Class, but more expensive
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.