Compare Mercedes-AMG GT C190 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 Coupe vs Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-AMG GT C190 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 Coupe

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-AMG GT C190 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class C205 CoupeMercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift
Variants
GT
GT Black Series
GT C
GT R
GT S
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180
C 180 7AT
C 180 9AT
C 200
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 7AT
C 200 9AT
C 220d
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 250 7AT
C 250 9AT
C 250d 4MATIC AT
C 250d AT
C 300 7AT
C 300 9AT
C 400 4MATIC AT
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score91%68%79%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 730hp of power and 800Nm of torque
  • More focused than its predecessors
  • Good handling
  • RWD
  • Still available with AMG V8
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
Cons
  • Very tight inside
  • Much uglier than the C204 C-Class Coupe and C208/C209 CLK
  • AWD nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.