Compare Mercedes-Benz E-Class W213 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz S-class W222 vs Toyota Century (G50)

Mercedes-Benz E-Class W213 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-class W222

Toyota Century (G50)

Mercedes-Benz E-Class W213 faceliftMercedes-Benz S-class W222Toyota Century (G50)
Variants
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 300
E 300d 4MATIC
E 300de
E 300de 4MATIC
E 300e
E 300e 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
AMG S 63
AMG S 63 L 4MATIC
AMG S 65 L
S 300h BlueTEC
S 300h L BlueTEC
S 320 L
S 350 BlueTEC
S 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
S 350 L BlueTEC
S 350 L BlueTEC 4MATIC
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC
S 400 4MATIC
S 400h
S 400h L
S 500
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC 9AT
S 500 9AT
S 500 L
S 500 L 4MATIC
S 500e L
S 600 L
4AT
6AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score87%98%69%
Pros
  • Good performance available
  • Still offered with V8
  • Rather solid drivetrain
  • M279 made the V12 bi-turbo even more reliable
  • Predictive MBC hydraulic suspension replaced ABC
  • Powerful and robust M278/M157 V8
  • All engines still available with RWD
  • Superb fit and finish
  • Outstanding interior appointments
  • True elegance
  • Smooth V12 engine
Cons
  • Too many electronics
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Generic exterior styling
  • Too many displays inside
  • Limited availability
  • Not built for the driver

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.